This Comment argues that the criminalization of homelessness is the wrong approach in addressing the homelessness crisis. By using quality of life and vagrancy laws as a guise to push homeless individuals into the shadows, the laws are further hurting the very population that they claim to aid. It examines the history of the criminalization of homelessness; the interplay between homelessness and health; the various approaches by state and local governments, particularly since the decision in Martin v. Boise; and the consequences of these approaches on the health outcomes of homeless individuals. The aim of this Comment is to ultimately provide a framework that can be applied by federal, state, and local governments in lieu of anti- homelessness laws that protect both the health and safety of the general population and homeless individuals.
Journal